MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 287%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 279%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics298% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory51.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '24 at 05:23
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$297
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 158
2-Core 307
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 990
96% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,405
87% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Nvidia(10DE 1794) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 427
Parallax 462
368% 447 fps
MRender 547
Gravity 366
Splatting 262
306% 392 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 298%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 278 27 70 26 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 482
Write 387
Mixed 15
SusWrite 94.4
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 0.4
44% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 6.7
DQ Mixed 10.6
35% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 100%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
191GB free
Firmware: 614900WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,136
Write 3,354
Mixed 2,834
695% 3,108 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68.4
231% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1133
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 972
741% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1561 1526 1616 1637 1730 1708 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 1853
Mixed 1,868
SusWrite 1,630
422% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 65.8
207% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 713
DQ Mixed 790
593% 793 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 286%
Great: 526%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
365GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 163 163 164 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 114
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 162
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
163GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 111 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 90.1
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 110
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C16-16GTZNC CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 F4-3600C16-16GTZNC CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 40.1
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 40.5
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 31.5" 2560 1369 GBT3209 M32UC
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $903
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback