Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 23:55
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
105% 199 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,137
108% 891 Pts
64-Core 1,530
95% 1,530 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 168
Parallax 346
140% 229 fps
MRender 285
Gravity 134
Splatting 239
180% 219 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 143%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
460GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1375 863 840 848 847 850 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,569
Write 1,732
Mixed 1337
SusWrite 937
314% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 59.1
194% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 962
691% 900 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 219%
Great: 276%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1662 1666 1666 1640 1619 1461 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2397
Write 1751
Mixed 1,657
SusWrite 1619
416% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 65.8
212% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,146
DQ Write 920
DQ Mixed 1,036
775% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 307%
Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 106 108 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 133
Mixed 69
SusWrite 108
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
72% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 41.4
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 2R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 54% 13 214 57 144 31.5" 1920 1080 ACR0000 ED320QR S
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback