Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory44.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 15:14
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 302
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1,018
97% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,372
85% 1,372 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 164
Parallax 366
138% 233 fps
MRender 291
Gravity 129
Splatting 237
180% 219 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
476GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1369 819 835 834 847 847 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,572
Write 1,759
Mixed 1,354
SusWrite 925
316% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 56.3
183% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 746
562% 764 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 211%
Great: 276%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1639 1653 1655 1647 1622 1473 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,315
Write 1,711
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 1,615
408% 1,821 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 61.3
197% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 785
DQ Mixed 933
690% 916 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 293%
Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 114 107 110 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 134
Mixed 70
SusWrite 109
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 39.1
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 41.2
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 3R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 42% 19 206 52 144 31.5" 1920 1080 ACR0000 ED320QR S
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback