Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory34.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 16:27
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 177
2-Core 350
108% 204 Pts
4-Core 657
8-Core 1,205
112% 931 Pts
64-Core 2322
144% 2322 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Device(7377 2100) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 196
Parallax 214
173% 207 fps
MRender 297
Gravity 169
Splatting 126
153% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 153%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,185
Write 3,354
Mixed 3032
714% 3,190 MB/s
4K Read 84.4
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 115
378% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,416
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1,236
931% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
WUH721816ALE6L4 16TB
27GB free
Firmware: PCGAW232
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 172 190 227 210 189 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 203
Write 199
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 192
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.3
8% 3.47 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 5.2
DQ Mixed 4.3
3% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22%
Great: 28%
WUH721816ALE6L4 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: PCGAW232
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 260 259 257 260 257 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 255
Write 249
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 260
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 0.7
9% 4.33 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 6.7
DQ Mixed 5.5
4% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
WDC WUH721816ALE6L4 16TB
4TB free
Firmware: PCGNW680
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 227 230 223 224 225 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.3% Poor
Read 214
Write 209
Mixed 117
SusWrite 225
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 0.7
18% 6.77 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 0.7
2% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 65%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
349GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1445 1130 1121 1135 1136 1120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,529
Write 2,408
Mixed 1,764
SusWrite 1181
441% 1,971 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 89.5
296% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,483
DQ Write 1144
DQ Mixed 1,288
970% 1,305 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 324%
Great: 372%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 186 183 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 188
Mixed 102
SusWrite 184
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
313% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
22GB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 181 181 178 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 138%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
11GB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 120 131 84 89 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70% Good
Read 138
Write 128
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 106
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
203% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70%
Great: 97%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: LDGNW240
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 186 190 184 184 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 138%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
794GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 169 160 159 168 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 150
Write 152
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 164
182% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3600C18D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 38.7
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1920 1009 VSC5337 VP2458
Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,203
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback