Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory47.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210910
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 13:16
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 94%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$210
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 194
2-Core 369
112% 214 Pts
4-Core 748
8-Core 1,410
129% 1,079 Pts
64-Core 2,368
147% 2,368 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 69.1
58% 71.8 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 67.6
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2052 2088 2067 2057 2077 1476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,835
Write 2,024
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 1,970
464% 2,075 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.6
208% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,160
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 852
652% 895 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 339%
Great: 382%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 118 120 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 119
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 88%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 226 223 217 223 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 196
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 223
124% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 125%
Great: 130%
WDC WD10 2KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB
7TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 243 243 240 242 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
Read 227
Write 240
Mixed 124
SusWrite 241
281% 208 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.7
236% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 176 173 170 158 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 172
Write 176
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 169
197% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
110% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2100 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 38.5
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 25.7
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback