Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240123
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '24 at 17:41
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 178
2-Core 357
112% 209 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,286
117% 984 Pts
64-Core 2,395
148% 2,395 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13,197
Write 8,814
Mixed 10,660
2,417% 10,890 MB/s
4K Read 645
4K Write 422
4K Mixed 461
1,792% 509 MB/s
DQ Read 1,667
DQ Write 1,246
DQ Mixed 1,425
1,074% 1,446 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
534GB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2270 2301 2239 2189 2087 1534 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 1,804
Write 2,299
Mixed 2,286
SusWrite 2,103
481% 2123 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 85.4
271% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 1363
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,213
912% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 340%
Great: 521%
MB4000GEQNH 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 169 171 173 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 173
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 171
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.3
151% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 33.4
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 36.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 22 60 0" 1280 720
Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback