Gigabyte GA-H87M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 17:36
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 166
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 279
40% 292 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Gigabyte(1458 379D) 3GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 36.8
Parallax 36.6
29% 36.4 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 24.1
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 341 348 343 351 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 352
Mixed 294
SusWrite 339
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 39.7
143% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 260
223% 328 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 65 94 82 94 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 77.4
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 66.4
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
183GB free
Firmware: 1A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 61 59 61 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 61.6
Mixed 37
SusWrite 59.7
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 41%
MB4000GEQNH 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 40.7
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 44.2
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87M-HD3 Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-HD3 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $264
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback