Casper EXCALIBUR G780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G780  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NL5J 001
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 10:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 706
73% 589 Pts
64-Core 872
54% 872 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.7% Very good
Lighting 85.6
Reflection 96.7
Parallax 85.6
70% 89.3 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 81.3
Splatting 82.6
72% 89.7 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$34
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 432 443 451 448 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 196
Mixed 341
SusWrite 441
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 32.5
119% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 161
147% 222 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 102%
HP EX950 2TB
378GB free
Firmware: 42AAT8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1715 1073 906 1144 1145 1150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1096
Write 1,383
Mixed 1,274
SusWrite 1,189
280% 1,236 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 72.8
241% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 592
550% 857 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 235%
Great: 407%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 29.4
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 29
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 144 16.7" 1280 720 BOE084F
Typical EXCALIBUR G780 Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback