Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics235% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory51.2 GB free of 80 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181227
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 06:56
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 278
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 862
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,448
90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$960
Nvidia(10DE 18CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
235% Outstanding
Lighting 321
Reflection 516
Parallax 384
262% 407 fps
MRender 478
Gravity 361
Splatting 240
281% 360 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 235%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$46
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,405
Write 1,936
Mixed 1,744
451% 2,028 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 66.7
217% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 898
658% 869 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
113GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1460 1470 1455 1453 1445 1205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,872
Write 1,460
Mixed 918
SusWrite 1,415
317% 1,416 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 50.7
175% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,087
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 479
424% 657 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 249%
Great: 283%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
10GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 89 89 90 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 151
Write 158
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 90.2
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 2.4
418% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-32GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-32GTZR 79GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767, 8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.6% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 23.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 3R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 25% 61 215 58 90 34.1" 1280 720 ACR0450 Acer X34
History: Score 39: 0P 3R 6G 6B | Score 33: 0P 3R 4G 6B
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $297

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback