HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8704
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 13:24
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 977
93% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,393
86% 1,393 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
Asus(1043 895A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 316
Parallax 221
164% 246 fps
MRender 343
Gravity 232
Splatting 184
199% 253 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 161%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-256G-1106 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,387
Write 1,956
Mixed 1,322
349% 1,555 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 62.3
215% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 541
517% 816 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 229%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 190 191 190 192 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 195
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 191
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 240 24.5" 1280 720 HPN360E OMEN X 25f
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback