HP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8997
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 06:08
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 66.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 208
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 490
51% 411 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8997) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 13.1
8% 13.4 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 14.4
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 574 379 304 319 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,418
Write 1,143
Mixed 949
SusWrite 463
222% 993 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 50
173% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 310
221% 288 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 151%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-069.A00G Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 31.7
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 14" 1280 720 LGD06F0
Typical 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback