Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HCB
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 05:32
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 67
1-Core 153
2-Core 290
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 786
80% 648 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 5.7
4% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 7
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SKC2500M8500G 500GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 644 530 503 510 503 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,832
Write 1303
Mixed 1,245
SusWrite 581
276% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 64
211% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 707
523% 709 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 206%
Great: 380%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
392GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1310 1329 1308 1233 991 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,951
Write 1,328
Mixed 1,100
SusWrite 1,033
302% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 83.2
285% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 405
312% 423 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 249%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 17.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 33 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB Builds (Compare 3,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HCB_FX506HCB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback