Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 142% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 137% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230223
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '24 at 17:51
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$138 15,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 71.2 1-Core 171 2-Core 337 101% 193 Pts	4-Core 631 8-Core 957 98% 794 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% EVGA(3842 3767) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Lighting 230 Reflection 203 Parallax 203 187% 212 fps	MRender 199 Gravity 153 Splatting 136 130% 163 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB 5,487 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231610WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,249 Write 1,503 Mixed 1,204 296% 1,318 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 66.5 248% 97.1 MB/s	DQ Read 980 DQ Write 864 DQ Mixed 925 693% 923 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 226%
QSSDS25240G 240GB 217 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 32GB free Firmware: V3.29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 100 64 64 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 477 Write 324 Mixed 313 SusWrite 98.1 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 15.5 97% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 25.2 56% 113 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 252GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 134 134 135 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 103 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 135 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 109%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 52GB free Firmware: 0002CE02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 49.7 Write 40.3 Mixed 30.3 SusWrite 39.4 29% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB 10,673 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 61GB free Firmware: MS1OA610 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 100 103 105 104 105 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 121 Write 121 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 104 67% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 244GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 77 76 77 77 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 84.4 Write 79.5 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 76.1 55% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 107 107 106 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	60% Above average	Read 102 Write 91.8 Mixed 68.4 SusWrite 107 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 40GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.9% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 26 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 26 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 0P 0R 3G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	38%	47	217	59	60	23.8"	1280 720	XZL2380 XZ3015

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,633x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,232x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	859x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	826x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	705x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	625x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	306x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	376x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	223x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	205x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $739

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16