Gigabyte GA-B150-HD3P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150-HD3P-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime14 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '24 at 16:49
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 292
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 6.9
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 124 95 99 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 360
Write 301
Mixed 256
SusWrite 124
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 8.6
59% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 17.6
45% 93.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$40
208GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 82 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 84.8
Write 82
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 81.8
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBR 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 12 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical GA-B150-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150-HD3P-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback