MSI Z590 PRO WIFI (MS-7D09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D09
MotherboardMSI Z590 PRO WIFI (MS-7D09)  (all builds)
Memory52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '24 at 07:37
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$229
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 265
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 910
87% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,043
64% 1,043 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 150
Parallax 138
135% 151 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 114
Splatting 98.5
98% 124 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 269
Write 183
Mixed 139
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 17.7
88% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 4.1
35% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
101GB free
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 70 56 57 54 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 460
Write 335
Mixed 340
SusWrite 93.4
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 34.3
117% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 228
186% 263 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 91%
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
119GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1161 863 710 259 224 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,342
Write 1,677
Mixed 1,280
SusWrite 573
274% 1,218 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 54.7
183% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,163
DQ Write 837
DQ Mixed 922
710% 974 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 190%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
773GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1946 1978 1577 1470 1491 1491 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 1,958
Mixed 1,654
SusWrite 1,659
411% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 59.7
198% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,103
DQ Write 829
DQ Mixed 981
729% 971 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 287%
Great: 410%
Apple HDD ST1000LM024 1TB
139GB free
Firmware: 2AR20008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 74 75 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 87.3
Write 48.9
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 74.2
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Chun Well Holding Limited D4U3236180B 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 31.1
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 14% 73 217 60 200 29.5" 1280 720 SPT0BCC Sceptre P30
History: Score 28: 0P 3R 3G 4B | Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B
Typical Z590 PRO WIFI (MS-7D09) Builds (Compare 6,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z590 PRO WIFI (MS-7D09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback