Lenovo 90VH00AKMW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90VH00AKMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3328
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230804
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '24 at 18:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 70.2
1-Core 161
2-Core 321
96% 184 Pts
4-Core 625
8-Core 1,006
100% 816 Pts
64-Core 1,412
87% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Legend(17AA 2320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 168
Parallax 185
116% 165 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 140
Splatting 106
118% 151 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 114%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BL7 512GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,573
Write 1,122
Mixed 549
238% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 56.2
192% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1134
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 945
719% 976 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 338%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
444GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 167 167 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 131
Write 137
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 167
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5190MF96HAF-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 26.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 144 24.5" 1920 1080 AOC2590 2590G4
Typical 90VH00AKMW Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90VH00AKMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $550
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback