Asus M5A78L-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 21:25
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 124
56% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 256
31% 239 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 360
XFX(1682 7360) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.Q3.1
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 26.2
15% 23.1 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 22.5
18% 21.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
29GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 83.3
Write 76
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 64.4
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 44 46 51 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 62.4
Write 47.6
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 45.7
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 18 18 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 44.2
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 18.7
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 47%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 18 17 18 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 107
Write 16.4
Mixed 17
SusWrite 18.7
29% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 40 60 21.7" 1280 720 KOA0030 KONKA LCDTV
Typical M5A78L-M LX Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback