Asus Z97-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-E  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160223
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 18:13
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 215
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 614
59% 488 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 64.7
49% 66.9 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 58.4
51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD13S 1TB
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2301B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 10 2.4 12 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 482
Write 440
Mixed 368
SusWrite 60.3
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 13.8
106% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 16.2
82% 184 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 98%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
36GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 84 87 78 64 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 476
Mixed 339
SusWrite 115
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 50.6
169% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 334
258% 352 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
16GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 451
Mixed 348
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 41.3
147% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 344
263% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
146GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 103
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 69%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 500GB
425GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 49 8.4 0 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 216 59 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2707 VG27AQ1A
Typical Z97-E Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback