Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200506
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 06:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 185
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 439
48% 379 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 2011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.6% Good
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 77.7
60% 75.9 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 74
Splatting 67.5
66% 82.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 90%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,733
Write 1,473
Mixed 1,379
340% 1,528 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 59.2
192% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 573
DQ Mixed 681
511% 687 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 297%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 11TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 182 176 158 154 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 136
Write 156
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 171
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.1
321% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.7% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 20
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 15% 116 215 60 60 27.9" 2560 1417 AUS28A0 VG28UQL1A
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback