Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.2
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 20:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 133
59% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 438
38% 325 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1097) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 8.2
4% 23 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 8.4
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,542
Write 2,259
Mixed 1,717
483% 2,173 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 57.3
202% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 408
377% 581 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 316%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 15.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.2 Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 61%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 54%

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $146Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $189Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback