Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 11:26
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 75.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 983
90% 757 Pts
64-Core 2,062
128% 2,062 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 192
Reflection 195
Parallax 175
157% 187 fps
Gravity 144
Splatting 129
120% 137 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,376
Write 2232
Mixed 1,653
464% 2,087 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 86.2
287% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 1,026
776% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: STPSC014
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,241
Write 1,222
Mixed 1,299
281% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 65.5
228% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,357
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,169
887% 1,199 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 296%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
476GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 444
Mixed 413
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 50.9
169% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
41GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 57.6
Mixed 81.8
105% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.2
224% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3866 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 42.7
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 34.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 114%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 1R 5G 16B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 43% 51 216 60 165 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback