Biostar B75MU3B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar B75MU3B  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120425
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '24 at 22:33
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 172
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 448
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 87.9
71% 87 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 70.2
69% 86.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 373 374 408 409 407 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 353
Write 358
Mixed 318
SusWrite 393
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 39.3
128% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 44.3
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 60.4
50% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62
392GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 217 216 229 229 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 212
Write 202
Mixed 191
SusWrite 224
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 34.2
110% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 83
DQ Mixed 52.1
42% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 215 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN372F HP M24fwa FHD
Typical B75MU3B Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar B75MU3B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $257
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback