Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG3  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 16:50
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 180
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 305
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1534 MHz, MLim: 1562 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 24.1
19% 22.9 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 19.6
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-128G-1006 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 231 220 237 237 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.6% Good
Read 251
Write 234
Mixed 191
SusWrite 220
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 32.5
118% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 128
114% 172 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 94%
MDT MD3200AACS-00ZUB0 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 63 61 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 59.5
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 60.8
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
233GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 138 133 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 138
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 133
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1870EC58E9F1333 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 9% 100 218 60 60 3.6" 1296 1024 CVT0001
Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback