HP Compaq dc7100 CMT(DX438AV)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq dc7100 CMT(DX438AV)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0968h
Memory2.1 GB free of 4.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 11:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 35.6
29% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 35.3
5% 35.5 Pts
64-Core 35
2% 35 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 8501) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 6.62
Parallax 7.47
5% 6.74 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.13
5% 6.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MDT MD3200AACS-00ZUB0 320GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 48 63 67 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 69.6
Mixed 52
SusWrite 58.3
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
DGB 1GB
0GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.53% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 2
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 2.3
6% 5.85 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33280 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 1.7
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7100 CMT(DX438AV) Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Compaq dc7100 CMT(DX438AV)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback