Acer TravelMate P249-G2-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer TravelMate P249-G2-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Lynx_SK
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170315
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 25 '24 at 02:52
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 140
58% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 214
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1133) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.7
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 99 92 76 73 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 338
Write 258
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 97.8
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 1
30% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 27.6
52% 104 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14C3
Typical TravelMate P249-G2-M Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P249-G2-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback