Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardJingsha To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 17:25
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 171
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 542
50% 417 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 512GB 512GB
160GB free
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 235 233 233 235 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.7% Above average
Read 259
Write 235
Mixed 214
SusWrite 234
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 13.1
95% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 16.5
56% 123 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 95%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R632D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 404 404 404 355 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
640GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 147 144 139 144 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 88.5
Write 134
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 143
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
230GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 119 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 127
Write 122
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 118
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 109%
USB3.0 high speed 160GB
10GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 55.3
Write 24.9
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 25
38% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung LO8G1600CL11 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.3
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 4R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 21% 33 213 59 60 0" 1280 720
Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $429
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback