HP G62 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP G62 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 143B
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 16:37
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P320-$20
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 64.5
34% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 55.9
8-Core 49.4
7% 52.7 Pts
64-Core 54.7
3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 143B) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 37 33 44 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 61.6
Write 48.3
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 40.7
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 51%
USB3.0 high speed 160GB
120GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 21 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Read 22.9
Write 21.4
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 19.7
22% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 INL000A
Typical G62 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP G62 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback