Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1145G7E 25 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 66.9 1-Core 89.7 2-Core 176 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 420 44% 356 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4575 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 27.8 0% 17.6 fps	MRender 17.8 Gravity 24.4 Splatting 15.4 15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 20%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE710T 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 82B0U9MP Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 2.3 Write 2.5 Mixed 2 0% 2.27 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 115%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 13GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 117 Write 10.2 Mixed 18.4 41% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 45% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GSH64V2B 2x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 27.5 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 13.9 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	26"	1280 720	XXX0000 IMTZ-15.6

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16