PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell XPS 8500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0NW73C |
Memory | 7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180625 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 15 '24 at 23:04 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD 480GB 500GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0607A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 220 139 140 146 141 MB/s
|
76.2%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 178 184 183 184 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
51% | 48% | 31 | 201 | 28 | 0 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | TCL0000 32S331 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,671x |
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples | 144x |
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples | 139x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 162x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 155x |
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples | 112x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $297 |