Asus PRIME Z790-A WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 219%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 237%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive473% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z790-A WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 13:35
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 79.7
1-Core 211
2-Core 422
122% 237 Pts
4-Core 831
8-Core 1,284
131% 1,058 Pts
64-Core 2,442
151% 2,442 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 118%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 6901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 249
Parallax 512
191% 332 fps
MRender 400
Gravity 206
Splatting 324
254% 310 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 190%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4184 4320 3547 1673 1652 1655 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
473% Outstanding
Read 2,742
Write 3,969
Mixed 2,963
SusWrite 2,838
709% 3,128 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 249
4K Mixed 101
358% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 2,002
DQ Write 1,574
DQ Mixed 1,768
1,328% 1,781 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 473%
Great: 521%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
243GB free
Firmware: VB411D64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1557 1553 1566 785 627 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,090
Write 1,427
Mixed 1300
SusWrite 1,053
328% 1,468 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 60.9
241% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 699
526% 687 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 252%
Great: 309%
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
35GB free
Firmware: V9001c19
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,785
Write 985
Mixed 799
261% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 50.1
217% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 456
363% 494 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 241%
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
241GB free
Firmware: V1.23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2373 2291 2361 1602 961 1036 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 1,943
Write 2,388
Mixed 1,790
SusWrite 1,771
446% 1,973 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 72.8
302% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 1,155
DQ Mixed 101
382% 847 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 331%
Great: 483%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
220GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 81 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 76.5
Write 76.7
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 78.5
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5600C36 CMH32GX5M2B5600C40 CMH32GX5M2B5600C36 CMH32GX5M2B5600C40 64GB
5600, 5600, 5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 72.9
MC Write 73.5
MC Mixed 68.2
204% 71.5 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 34
103% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 182%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 31.5" 2560 1440 SAM7233 Odyssey G7
Typical PRIME Z790-A WIFI Builds (Compare 4,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 442%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z790-A WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback