Asus PRIME H510M-E

Performance Results

Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 79%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-E  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 691
69% 562 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 8
5% 6.43 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 346 353 345 343 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 538
Write 315
Mixed 268
SusWrite 345
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 25.5
96% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 204
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 241%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61% Good
Read 103
Write 97
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 109
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
57GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 31.6
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 22.4
41% 31 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.2
218% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20%
Great: 43%
Generic- Micro SD 64GB
32GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 31.3
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 2.8
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.3
214% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8PT 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H510M-E Builds (Compare 6,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback