Asus P8P67 WS REVOLUTION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 WS REVOLUTION  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110920
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 12:56
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 497
53% 423 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 102
Parallax 64
53% 76.8 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 56.2
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 434
Mixed 338
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 42.7
139% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 124
148% 260 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
141GB free
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 368 330 66 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 421
Write 352
Mixed 297
SusWrite 204
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 32.8
109% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 91.3
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 126
94% 122 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 102%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
263GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 114 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 164
Write 179
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 112
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1.3
30% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 1.9
3% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-453.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC29B 27M1C5500V
Typical P8P67 WS REVOLUTION Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 WS REVOLUTION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback