Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX517ZM
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230503
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 09:12
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 61.2
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 176
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 578
57% 466 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1C6C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3962
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 20
14% 20.4 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 17.4
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,907
Write 3,085
Mixed 2,338
620% 2,776 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 69.4
242% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 643
DQ Mixed 773
575% 767 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1475 1494 1492 1482 1332 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,154
Write 1,584
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 1,231
350% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 86.4
291% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 409
356% 519 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 277%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 46.6
MC Mixed 50.1
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 124%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 144 15.5" 1920 1017 CMN153C
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM Builds (Compare 1,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback