Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 04:33
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 85
2-Core 155
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 402
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 0974) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 49
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 45.3
40% 54.3 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59
Splatting 52.3
46% 57 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 363 275 274 306 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 432
Write 424
Mixed 398
SusWrite 313
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 31.1
105% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 293
225% 307 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
956GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 54 68 49 73 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 70.2
Write 53.1
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 67.2
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
564GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 48 48 59 65 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 75.8
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 53.8
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
883GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 83 83 81 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 77.9
Write 81.3
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 83.1
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 10 30 20" 1886 720 ACR015D Acer G205HL
Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $364
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback