Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 19:26
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 307
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 29 28 27 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$97
222GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 240 231 234 219 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 408
Mixed 383
SusWrite 231
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 49.7
157% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
398GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 96 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 101
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 95.5
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 146 142 146 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 76.3
Write 91.1
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 143
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 19
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback