Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 07:59
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 155
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 547
49% 416 Pts
64-Core 912
56% 912 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Zotac(19DA 8633) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 138
Parallax 110
96% 122 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 84.9
83% 104 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 281 282 282 291 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1149
Write 1,108
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 394
206% 921 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 60.7
203% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 606
446% 591 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 159%
Great: 222%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
794GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 118 117 119 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 70.2
Write 93.8
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 117
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5700-017.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 11.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 5R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 19% 75 216 58 120 23.8" 1280 720 HPN36DA HP X24ih
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback