Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '23 at 05:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 620
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 909
56% 909 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Zotac(19DA 8633) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.5% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 118
Parallax 121
105% 123 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 103
Splatting 87.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 284 295 300 299 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1276
Write 1,142
Mixed 1,114
SusWrite 350
217% 971 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 62.5
211% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 635
464% 610 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 165%
Great: 222%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
495GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 114 116 120 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 65.1
Write 110
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 115
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5700-017.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback