PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime22.8 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 10:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$350
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 836
78% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 173
Parallax 163
130% 165 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 160
Splatting 117
108% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 347 429 428 441 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 342
Write 101
Mixed 303
SusWrite 395
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 30.8
123% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 195
175% 261 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265
763GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 361 441 442 450 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 396
Mixed 372
SusWrite 408
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 47.2
154% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 358
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$196
9.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 211 227 225 227 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 26.3
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 9.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 27" 2560 1377 BNQ7F45 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,024
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback