PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF
Memory	57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '23 at 08:37
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$350 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 71.1 1-Core 130 2-Core 255 82% 152 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 836 80% 662 Pts	64-Core 1,401 87% 1,401 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 155 Reflection 175 Parallax 164 127% 165 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 165 Splatting 116 109% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 355GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKT1A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 393 436 437 444 440 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 192 Write 101 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 408 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 9.3 39% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 196 138% 164 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 904GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 408 445 452 454 451 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 424 Mixed 398 SusWrite 421 95% 420 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 49.5 158% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 359 270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$196 396 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 9.5TB free Firmware: DN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 224 225 230 229 229 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 58.4 MC Mixed 26.2 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 9 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	144	27"	2560 1440	BNQ7F45 ZOWIE XL LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 103%

UFO

System: PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $350Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	3x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	4x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 480GBKingston $175Bench 73%, 24,007 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
850 Evo 2TBSamsung $265Bench 112%, 8,527 samples	1x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $1,024

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369