Asrock B450M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive433% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 00:34
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 279
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 875
85% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 122
Parallax 107
103% 119 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 91.9
87% 109 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 624361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2517 2539 2509 2711 2717 2726 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
433% Outstanding
Read 2,845
Write 2,788
Mixed 2,502
SusWrite 2,620
606% 2,689 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 90.2
329% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,538
DQ Write 1,069
DQ Mixed 1,194
921% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 292%
This bench: 433%
Great: 682%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
749GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 360 343 360 356 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 432
Mixed 382
SusWrite 366
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 41
146% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 230
209% 319 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 117%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
88GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 91 96 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 155
Write 125
Mixed 130
SusWrite 97.5
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 31.7
134% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 113
90% 125 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 61%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
112GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 94 100 92 95 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 158
Write 112
Mixed 133
SusWrite 96.3
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 31.1
132% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 111
88% 123 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 30
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 30.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1920 1009 GSM56F5 W2453
Typical B450M/ac Builds (Compare 1,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback