Asrock B450M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive402% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 05:21
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 75.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 257
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 844
84% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 113
Parallax 95.8
92% 107 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 80.7
75% 94.2 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 624361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2414 2433 2497 2626 2604 2635 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 2,441
Write 2,481
Mixed 2,216
SusWrite 2,535
546% 2,418 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 81.9
305% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,391
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,248
938% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 292%
This bench: 402%
Great: 682%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 414 370 359 364 356 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 447
Mixed 378
SusWrite 387
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 44.8
156% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 258
221% 325 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 106%
Great: 117%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
88GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 96 101 94 89 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 154
Write 118
Mixed 129
SusWrite 94.5
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 29.1
122% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 113
89% 124 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
112GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 85 87 92 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 155
Write 115
Mixed 132
SusWrite 90.4
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 30.3
121% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 114
90% 124 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 29.2
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DF6 SAMSUNG
Typical B450M/ac Builds (Compare 1,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback