Today's hottest deals

MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200831
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 834
84% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,108
68% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 90.3
54% 73.3 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 47
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 282 275 275 261 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 287
Mixed 264
SusWrite 273
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 38.2
132% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 206
187% 287 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 129%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
59GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 163 125 135 126 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 214
Write 405
Mixed 117
SusWrite 143
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 31.5
133% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 164
153% 242 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70%
Great: 117%
Maxtor 6 L200M0 200GB
186GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
Read 32.6
Write 38
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 37
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
142% 1.57 MB/s
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.9 8.4 9.6 7.4 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 12
Write 10.5
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 8.4
14% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 24.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550-A PRO (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 10,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550-A PRO (MS-7C56)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $739
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback