MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191225
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateJan 07 '24 at 02:34
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 252
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 668
74% 582 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 52.5
43% 54.2 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 50
Splatting 46.6
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 77 82 80 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 410
Write 82.4
Mixed 119
SusWrite 79.9
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 19.1
85% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 114
90% 127 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 128%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
341GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 414 424 456 459 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 350
Write 216
Mixed 323
SusWrite 440
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 28.5
115% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 170
159% 242 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 102%
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
26GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 4.2 41 13 87 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 415
Write 265
Mixed 282
SusWrite 61
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 28
117% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 192
168% 246 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
724GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 126 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 120
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 124
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
72GB free
Firmware: PB3OCA1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 50 48 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 61
Write 50.6
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 48.7
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 30% 20 214 58 60 24" 1920 1017 ACR0575 ED273
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback