Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 02:27
Run Duration407 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 75.4
1-Core 231
2-Core 463
130% 257 Pts
4-Core 918
8-Core 1,608
153% 1,263 Pts
64-Core 3,262
202% 3,262 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 124%
Great: 131%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 11.5
9% 12.6 fps
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7% Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
EVGA(3842 4877) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 305
Reflection 266
Parallax 304
248% 292 fps
Gravity 247
Splatting 182
186% 215 fps
Poor: 143% Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,020
Write 2,045
Mixed 1692
428% 1,919 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 68.1
275% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,693
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,502
1,136% 1,530 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
397GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 331 331 325 342 381 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 342
Write 49.3
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 312
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 0.9
50% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 0.8
28% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
637GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 384 393 396 397 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 331
Mixed 350
SusWrite 391
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 47.5
156% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 227
170% 226 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2835 2879 3088 3166 3137 2968 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
438% Outstanding
Read 2,442
Write 2,844
Mixed 2,184
SusWrite 3,012
593% 2,621 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 77.4
272% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1798
DQ Write 1,491
DQ Mixed 1,649
1,234% 1,646 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 438%
Great: 508%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
466GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 214 66 68 138 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 3,500
Mixed 2213
SusWrite 156
443% 1,962 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 301
4K Mixed 88
361% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 1,791
DQ Write 1,399
DQ Mixed 1,627
1,208% 1,606 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 269%
Great: 441%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 182 180 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 146
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 178
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.7
327% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G56C46U5.M8D1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
131% Outstanding
MC Read 53.4
MC Write 49
MC Mixed 49.2
144% 50.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 27.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 131%
Great: 181%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 27" 1280 720 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback