Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 18:12
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 178
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 358
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 245 254 257 259 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 408
Write 250
Mixed 264
SusWrite 253
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 29.6
107% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 191
160% 231 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
990GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 172 172 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 185
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 171
101% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 108%
AMicro AM8180 NVME 1TB
915GB free, PID e101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 38.1
Write 39.2
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 41.3
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 15.7
1,014% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 24.3
DQ Mixed 19.9
1,569% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 23.1" 1280 720 SAM0592 SyncMaster
Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback