Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '18 at 21:11
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 594
63% 505 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1539 MHz, MLim: 1771 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 65.1
61% 71.1 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 58.3
54% 67.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 412
Mixed 420
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 37.1
140% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 107
120% 208 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 115%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
21GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 497
Write 155
Mixed 224
64% 292 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 18.9
72% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 48.8
DQ Mixed 45.6
62% 120 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580
246GB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 81.8
Mixed 73.2
65% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.37
65% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 75%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB
1GB free, PID e0ed
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 9.86
6% 9.86 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 20
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $539
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback