HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 231%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive360% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8917
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '24 at 00:41
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 198
2-Core 383
115% 220 Pts
4-Core 730
8-Core 1,364
125% 1,047 Pts
64-Core 2,311
143% 2,311 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 253
Parallax 321
228% 285 fps
MRender 328
Gravity 238
Splatting 171
192% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-512G-1106 512GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2996 2110 1270 2919 2898 1203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 3,555
Write 2,888
Mixed 2,313
SusWrite 2,233
615% 2,747 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 53.4
182% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 327
300% 485 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 360%
Great: 406%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X HS 2000GB
2TB free
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4447 4700 4636 4632 4648 4701 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
549% Outstanding
Read 4,299
Write 3,435
Mixed 2,631
SusWrite 4,627
843% 3,748 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 60.5
224% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 359
326% 521 MB/s
Poor: 321%
This bench: 549%
Great: 667%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 187 186 187 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 179
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 186
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 112%
Great: 108%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 241 234 230 235 238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 228
Mixed 112
SusWrite 236
145% 198 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.8
344% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3733C19D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 45.4
MC Mixed 42.1
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 50.1
SC Mixed 34.1
104% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 28 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2781 VL279
Typical OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $929
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback