HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8917
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 16:32
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 202
2-Core 407
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1,218
116% 960 Pts
64-Core 2,332
144% 2,332 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 277
Reflection 249
Parallax 288
226% 271 fps
MRender 321
Gravity 230
Splatting 169
188% 240 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 191%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-512G-1106 512GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2223 2024 2216 2200 2209 1005 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 3840
Write 2,536
Mixed 1,820
SusWrite 1,979
566% 2,544 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 37.4
150% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 270
274% 471 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 345%
Great: 406%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X HS 2000GB
2TB free
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2467 2250 2408 2371 2225 2171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 4,401
Write 2,464
Mixed 2,050
SusWrite 2,315
624% 2,807 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 41.5
185% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 188
235% 446 MB/s
Poor: 321%
This bench: 398%
Great: 667%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 239 234 229 235 238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 225
Mixed 110
SusWrite 236
145% 198 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.7
332% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 185 184 186 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 172
Mixed 93
SusWrite 184
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3733C19D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 42.2
MC Mixed 39.4
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 32.2
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2781 VL279
Typical OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $929
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback