HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 240%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8917
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 18:17
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 206
2-Core 404
119% 229 Pts
4-Core 782
8-Core 1,452
134% 1,117 Pts
64-Core 2,410
149% 2,410 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
HP(103C 88D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 250
Parallax 291
228% 273 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 236
Splatting 170
191% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD WD_BLACK Gen4 SDCPNRY-512G-1106 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3047 2811 3002 3122 1093 1067 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 3,718
Write 3,075
Mixed 2,287
SusWrite 2,357
640% 2,859 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 48.8
171% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 364
331% 529 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 372%
Great: 406%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X HS 2000GB
2TB free
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3206 3335 3411 3373 3295 3076 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
466% Outstanding
Read 4,250
Write 3,371
Mixed 2,662
SusWrite 3,283
760% 3,391 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 62.6
221% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,086
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 321
314% 526 MB/s
Poor: 321%
This bench: 466%
Great: 667%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 240 234 230 232 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 221
Mixed 109
SusWrite 236
144% 196 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.7
326% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 187 185 184 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 178
Mixed 106
SusWrite 185
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 115%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3733C19D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 41.2
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 34.1
105% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2781 VL279
Typical OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 45L Gaming Desktop GT22-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback