Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory51.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 23:20
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 203
2-Core 406
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,557
140% 1,180 Pts
64-Core 3,427
212% 3,427 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 286
Parallax 321
245% 303 fps
MRender 348
Gravity 249
Splatting 182
204% 260 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 205%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,039
Write 2,391
Mixed 2,290
503% 2,240 MB/s
4K Read 75.6
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 113
381% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,786
DQ Write 1,315
DQ Mixed 1535
1,151% 1,545 MB/s
Poor: 299% Great: 592%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
465GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,702
Write 2,161
Mixed 1,925
503% 2,263 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 98.2
345% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,837
DQ Write 1,462
DQ Mixed 1,594
1,208% 1631 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,129
Write 4,180
Mixed 3,326
796% 3,545 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 100
348% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1833
DQ Write 1,396
DQ Mixed 1,602
1,201% 1,610 MB/s
Poor: 299% Great: 592%
Seagate Expansion HDD 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 159
Mixed 43.5
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.7
380% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 94%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
29GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.4
Write 9.5
Mixed 7.7
16% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.2
99% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP64GX5M2X6600C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
235% Outstanding
MC Read 165
MC Write 51.8
MC Mixed 60.8
264% 92.5 GB/s
SC Read 42.6
SC Write 56.5
SC Mixed 47.3
139% 48.8 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 235%
Great: 235%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 0R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 14% 71 218 60 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2720 VG278
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $2,230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback